Tom Gentzsch vs Marlon Vankan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Aug at 11:20 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Gentzsch vs M. Vankan

 GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

 GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Gentzsch 1 - 0 Vankan
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tom Gentzsch winning 2 and Marlon Vankan winning 0. The last match between Tom Gentzsch and Marlon Vankan was at the M15 Ystad, 16-08-2025, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory w/o.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Gentzsch | 1 | 
| Vankan | 0 | 
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(SF) M15 Ystad(08-16-25)
(R1) M15 Antalya(04-16-25)
T. Gentzsch vs M. Vankan H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 | 
| 59.01% (190-132) | Career Total W/L | 53.96% (177-151) | 
| 1 | Clay | 0 | 
| 7 | Titles | 1 | 
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 | 
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) | 
T. Gentzsch vs M. Vankan Match Preview:
- Is second serve performance a key area to look at? Gentzsch has a slight advantage, winning 42.97% of points compared to Vankan's 41.05%.
 - How about return game effectiveness? Vankan leads with a 49.28% success rate on opponent's second serves, while Gentzsch stands at 45.96%.
 - In return stats for first serves, Vankan is again ahead with 30.43%, beating Gentzsch's 26.17%.
 - Under pressure, who handles better? Gentzsch edges out by saving 54.28% of breakpoints, slightly higher than Vankan’s 53.81%.
 - In terms of overall match success, Gentzsch boasts a 64.63% win rate in the last year, outperforming Vankan's 55.93%.
 - What about surface preferences? Gentzsch prefers hard courts with a 60% win rate, while Vankan excels on clay with a 56% win rate.
 - Regarding competition levels, Gentzsch has a higher performance in lower-tier events, winning 70.97% of matches compared to Vankan's 55.93%.
 - Does opponent quality differ? Yes, Vankan has faced higher-ranked players, with an average opponent rank of 365.44, compared to Gentzsch’s 427.35.
 - Who handles deciding sets better? Gentzsch has a 44% win rate in deciding sets, while Vankan manages 37%.
 - What about break point conversions? Vankan is more efficient, converting 39.07% compared to Gentzsch’s 27.75%.
 
Editorial Prediction (August 15, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance and statistics, Gentzsch holds a slight edge in terms of overall match success and handling pressure, notably excelling in Futures/Satellites events.
Vankan, however, has demonstrated an advantage in returning games and facing higher-ranked opponents, which may pose a unique challenge for Gentzsch.
Despite Vankan's superior performance in certain return stats, the combination of Gentzsch's consistency, better under-pressure tendencies, and higher win rate suggests a likely victory for Gentzsch in this upcoming match.
Tom Gentzsch vs Marlon Vankan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Gentzsch vs M. Vankan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 | 
| 9 | Games Won | 3 | 
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 | 
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 | 
| 1:1:57 | Average Match Time | 1:1:57 | 
| 63% (25/40) | 1st Serve % | 76% (26/34) | 
| 72% (18/25) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (14/26) | 
| 67% (10/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (3/8) | 
| 75% (3/4) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) | 
| 50% (17/34) | Return Points Win % | 30% (12/40) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
Recent Performance Stats
T. Gentzsch Recent Matches Played
M. Vankan Recent Matches Played

T. Gentzsch vs M. Vankan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.01% (190/132) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.96% (177/151) | 
| 57.86% (427/311) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.52% (395/343) | 
| 52.47% (3715/3365) | Games Win/Loss | 51.17% (3501/3341) | 
| 61.33% (46/29) | Hard Win/Loss | 34.62% (9/17) | 
| 60.99% (111/71) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.36% (164/127) | 
| 50.77% (33/32) | Indoor Hard W/L | 36.36% (4/7) | 
| 0.42 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 | 
| 1447 | Aces Total | 333 | 
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 | 
| 1096 | Total Double Faults | 586 | 
| 1:29:14 | Average Match Time | 1:14:23 | 
| 426.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 370.85 | 
| 63% (12419/19850) | 1st Serve % | 66% (10523/15929) | 
| 71% (8801/12419) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (6555/10523) | 
| 47% (3528/7431) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2613/5406) | 
| 42% (812/1932) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (745/1695) | 
| 40% (7811/19711) | Return Points Win % | 41% (6558/15848) | 
| 48.28% (28/30) | Challenger W/L | 40.00% (4/6) | 
| 61.36% (162/102) | Futures W/L | 54.40% (173/145) | 
| 58% (182/313) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (175/323) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 
| 64% (62/97) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (32/61) | 
| 47% (48/103) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (43/85) | 
| 85% (197/167) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (172/153) | 
| 15% (197/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (172/19) | 
| 17% (125/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (156/23) |